MCPAMine Clearance Planning Agency

Afghan humanitarian mine actionSince 1990

The record

The record since 1990

What MCPA has surveyed, cleared, destroyed and taught, and who has paid for it, as recorded in its programme records. Every figure is cumulative from 1990 to May 2026 unless it says otherwise.

Source: MCPA Organisational Profile (2026) · figures to May 2026 · about our sources

Totals

128.5M m²cleared and released (128,541,993 m²)
374M m²surveyed and re-surveyed (374,344,225 m²)
178.1M m²cancelled through survey, returned without physical clearance
266,480items of explosive ordnance destroyed
888,824people reached by risk education, in Dari and Pashto
USD 123.15Mdonor funding delivered across 105+ projects for 11 donor groups

Land

Land released, and how

Most of the threat MCPA has dealt with has been minefields, with a substantial share of battle-area clearance.

Land cleared and released, by type

Total 128,541,993 m²

  • Minefields 99,961,479 m² · 77.8%
  • Battle-area clearance 24,674,585 m² · 19.2%
  • Residual contamination 3,629,415 m² · 2.8%
  • Abandoned improvised mines 276,514 m² · 0.2%

Survey

  • 157,017,549 m² new hazardous area surveyed
  • 217,326,676 m² re-surveyed
  • 178,052,539 m² cancelled: land returned to communities without physical clearance, because survey found no evidence of danger

Dogs and machines

  • 469,440 m² verified by mine detection dogs and mechanical assets
  • more than 7.4 million m² of ground preparation

Ordnance

266,480 items destroyed

The full range of contamination found in Afghanistan, from small-arms ammunition and unexploded ordnance to mines, abandoned improvised mines and cluster munitions.

Explosive ordnance destroyed, by type

  1. Small-arms ammunition139,728
  2. Unexploded ordnance (UXO)77,620
  3. Anti-personnel mines40,636
  4. Anti-vehicle mines3,627
  5. Miscellaneous3,504
  6. Cluster munitions729
  7. Abandoned improvised mines636

Reach

34 provinces, 8 regions

MCPA has implemented mine-action projects in every province of Afghanistan. Point at a region to see its provinces.

Map of Afghanistan's 34 provinces, grouped into 8 mine-action regions. MCPA has delivered projects in every province. Shading shows where MCPA has worked, not land that has been cleared. Badakhshan (North-East region)Badghis (West region)Baghlan (North-East region)Balkh (North region)Bamyan (Central Highlands region)Daykundi (Central Highlands region)Farah (West region)Faryab (North region)Ghazni (South-East region)Ghor (West region)Helmand (South region)Herat (West region)Jawzjan (North region)Kabul (Central region)Kandahar (South region)Kapisa (Central region)Khost (South-East region)Kunar (East region)Kunduz (North-East region)Laghman (East region)Logar (Central region)Maidan Wardak (Central region)Nangarhar (East region)Nimroz (South region)Nuristan (East region)Paktia (South-East region)Paktika (South-East region)Panjshir (Central region)Parwan (Central region)Samangan (North region)Sar-e-Pol (North region)Takhar (North-East region)Uruzgan (South region)Zabul (South region)

This is a map of where MCPA has worked, not of cleared land. Contamination remains across Afghanistan. Colours distinguish the eight national mine-action regions.

Provinces by mine-action region, with the number of region-specific MCPA projects
RegionProvincesRegion-specific projects
CentralKabul, Kapisa, Parwan, Maidan Wardak, Logar, Panjshir23
Central HighlandsBamyan, Daykundi2
EastNangarhar, Kunar, Laghman, Nuristan9
NorthBalkh, Jowzjan, Sar-e Pol, Samangan, Faryab6
North-EastKunduz, Takhar, Baghlan, Badakhshan9
SouthKandahar, Helmand, Zabul, Uruzgan, Nimruz16
South-EastGhazni, Paktia, Paktika, Khost19
WestHerat, Farah, Badghis, GhorCovered by national surveys
Nationwide and multi-provinceProgrammes covering several regions at once, up to 26 provinces36

Project counts as given in MCPA's Organisational Profile (2026). Western provinces have been covered through national survey programmes. Province boundaries: geoBoundaries (public domain).

Funding

USD 123.15M, delivered to national standards

Support has come from the United Nations, the United States, humanitarian pooled funds, the European Commission, Japan and others, in every five-year period since 1990.

By donor group

  1. UNMAS / Voluntary Trust Fund (through UNOPS)USD 57.7M 46.9%
  2. US Department of State, PM/WRAUSD 44.4M 36%
  3. OCHA-managed pooled funds (CBPF / AHF)USD 15.1M 12.2%
  4. European CommissionUSD 2.7M 2.2%
  5. Government of JapanUSD 1.6M 1.3%
  6. Others: UNDP, World Bank, VVAF, ITF, DRCUSD 1.7M 1.4%

By five-year period

USD millions. Investment peaked at USD 41.2 million in 2010 to 2014.

  1. $5.8M1990–94
  2. $7.8M1995–99
  3. $14.8M2000–04
  4. $22.4M2005–09
  5. $41.2M2010–14
  6. $14.3M2015–19
  7. $16.6M2020–24
  8. $0.2M2025+partial period

The profile records USD 0.2 million from 2025 onward. That period is incomplete and may not yet include all current awards.

Survey and clearance

About a third of all investment has paid for survey and data work that defines where contamination is, and is not; two thirds for the clearance that removes it.

  • Clearance and demining USD 83.3M · 68%
  • Survey USD 39.8M · 32%

How MCPA is funded

MCPA is funded project by project. Each project carries its own donor-mandated external audit, and in-house finance, logistics and inventory systems produce customised donor reports.

Governance and accountability